Friday, 5 November 2010

Danish


Occasional comments on this blog made by a Danish reader remind me of my impression that of all the languages of Europe the one with the most difficult phonetics (for the outsider) is Danish.

It is the only (standard literary) European language whose vowels I feel despairingly uncertain about identifying, and even the consonants are not without problems.

Why should this be?
  • No two published sources seem to agree on the makeup of the vowel system or how to write the vowels in IPA. I try to follow the system used by Peter Molbæk Hansen in his Udtaleordbog (Gyldendal, 1990) — but he recognizes thirty distinct vowels (16 short, 14 long) as against the 20 [sic] or 17 [count them] listed in the Wikipedia article on Danish language or the 27 listed in its article on Danish phonology. (At least the latter article acknowledges that the vowel system is “unstable”, with various potential ongoing mergers.)
  • Vowels undergo striking lowering when adjacent to /r/, which is uvular. After a vowel, (historical) /r/ gets vocalized and sometimes absorbed by the vowel, leading to further difficulties in identification.
  • Several sets of adjacent vowels are very similar to one another.
    ˈmiːləmile
    ˈmeːləmele
    ˈmɛːləmæle
    ˈmaːləmale
    That looks fine, but then you find that the is considerably closer than cardinal 2, the “ɛː” is about cardinal 2, and the “” is about cardinal 3. Everything is pushed forward and up. (I also get the impression that the “” is slightly centralized — a push-chain?)
  • All the plosives are voiceless, but with a contrast of aspiration, often verging on affrication. Postvocalically they are strikingly lenited, sometimes disappearing completely. There’s a suburb of Copenhagen called Amager which is ˈɑmɑːˀ. It must once have had a velar consonant corresponding to the written g. Someone who comes from Amager is an amager (uncapitalized), which is ˈɑmɑːˀɑ. Clear? Furthermore, the word mad ‘meal’ is supposed to be /mað/ (i.e. [mɛð̞]. But that final approximant sounds to me awfully like a lateral.
  • There is a phonation phenomenon known as stød, represented in the examples just given by the ad hoc symbol ˀ. This is the phonologically contrastive use of creaky voice on a vowel or vowel plus sonorant. There are plenty of minimal pairs, such as mor moːɐ̯ ‘mother’ vs mord moːˀɐ̯ ‘murder’.
  • As with English, the spelling does not enable you to predict the pronunciation with any certainty.
Any comments comparing Danish to a throat disease will be deleted.

110 comments:

  1. I was thinking about learning a Scandinavian language. This one sounds like a challenge. I don't know if there's any use in learning a Scandinavian language though. A lot of them (Scandinavians) seem to be very good at English.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are the [a] and [ɑ] sounds phonologically contrastive? From Wikipedia they don't seem to be, but you've transcribed 'male' as /ˈmaːlə/ and 'Amager' as /ˈɑmɑːˀ/.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, they are phonologically contrastive.

      Delete
    2. It depends on the analysis. Some analyze [ɑː] as /ar/. With this analysis [a] and [ɑ] are in complementary distribution, but there are some important exceptions.

      Delete
  3. @Phil - try Icelandic.

    Unlike the other Scandinavian languages it's retained a high degree of inflexion and lots of interesting grammatical features that other Indo-European languages have lost (for example the dual number).

    It also has a tradition of coining new words from native Norse roots, like 'sjónvarp' for 'television'. This means you have to learn a new word for everything instead of relying on localised versions of common international vocabulary as you can with most European languages.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Damn! I've always wanted to learn Danish - I got impressed by a Danish porn magazine one of my brothers fetch home when we were children. Would Swedish be so phonetically difficult? (I understand some of its features resemble tonal languages, which scares me a bit.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Essentially", every time you try to suppress your gag reflex in Denmark, somewbody in Sweden sings in a puzzled or haughty way.

    Jokes aside, quite different.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "...that final approximant sounds to me awfully like a lateral".

    I've only ever spent a few weeks around Denmark but I've been puzzled never to've found any accounts of Danish pronunciation that mentioned what I've noted as marked lateralisation of their /ð/.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just a few comments from a native speaker:
    /ð/ is indeed a tricky consonant to describe. I think the symbol /ð/ has been chosen mainly for historical reasons (it corresponds to Swedish and Norwegian /d/ and /t/, and to Old Norse /d/, /t/ and /ð/).
    It Danish dialects, it has often been weakened to /j/ or even reduced to zero. Indeed, I'd recommend to foreigners who cannot pronounce it to replace it with /j/, but definitely not with /l/.
    To articulate it, start out with a velarised /l/ (as in English 'full'), and then lower the tip of the tongue so that it touches the lower front teeth.
    I guess the alternatives to the current notation would either be /l/ with a diacritic to specify a lowered tip of the tongue, or /j/ with a diacritic to specify a raised tongue position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alternatively ask the speaker to articulate as "the" from English. In the word "hedder" that would come to /he/-/ðɔ/.

      Of course the sound ɔ can also be tricky.

      Delete
  8. @ Thomas Widmann: That doesn't sound too difficult, if you're describing it right and I'm doing it right.

    ReplyDelete
  9. According to Danish phonology, /ð/ is an approximant [ð̞], like how Spanish /d/ is pronounced most of the time.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I noticed the Danish phonology article on Wikipedia calls /r/ a uvular/pharyngeal approximant. Is this different from the uvular approximant that might occur in, say, French?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thomas Widmann: a velarised l?? Surely it has palatal rather than velar resonance?

    Kevin: that claim was my starting point. I think it is wrong, as I said.

    Carlos: yes, different. The French /r/ is typically fricative (or even trilled) rather than approximant.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ John: Thank you, but what I was trying to ask is why it said "uvular/pharyngeal" in that article. Would this be a different place of articulation than uvular?

    ReplyDelete
  13. @John Wells, yes, definitely velarised (i.e., [ð̞ˠ]), although this might only apply to the younger generations (I'm 38, and mine is definitely somewhat velarised).

    ReplyDelete
  14. @ John: As a linguist, and Dane, I've certainly noticed velarisation in the [ð], the younger generations, especially from Copenhagen, tend to pronounce it so it would be transcribed in narrow IPA as a ð with a lowering sign for approximant, a minus sign below plus a superscript gamma for velarisation. It tends to affect high front vowels so that [i] sounds rounded, [y], or maybe better described as centralised from the velarisation, [ɨ]. Also [e̝] sounds rounded or centralised sometimes.

    Also, the [ð] isn't its own phoneme, according to the analysis I've learnt, but rather just an allophone of /d/, so that "mad" would simply be /mad/.
    Anyway, interesting to read about one's own language from another point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Jake, if you'd record yourself saying it, I'd be delighted to comment on the result. I actually don't think it's a very difficult sound to produce, it's just fairly unique.
    @Carlos, the French /r/ is similar, but I don't know enough about French phonetics to comment. The Danish /r/ can often sound a lot like an Arabic `ayin.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Marc: So would it be OK to pronounce Danish "mad" with a final (alveolar or dental?) [d], like e.g. the final consonant in English "mad"?

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Anonymous: No. In syllable final position the /d/ is prunounced [ð]. The pronunciation with a final (unvoiced) [d] would belong to a final underlying /t/.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I see, Marc... Just another question: Bearing in mind what Mr Wells says about the difficulties of Danish pronunciation, what advice would you give to foreign learners wanting to master it? Do you know of any practical handbooks on the issue?
    Mange tak!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I learnt Danish when I was 16 when I had some, but not very much phonetic training. (I remember sitting across the lunch table from our Danish exchange studing staring at his teeth to see what he was doing as he taught me to say "rødgrød med fløde". I am told I have a decent Danish accent. I would describe the difference between a a Danish ð and an English one thus: The English one can have the tip of the tongue peeking through the teeth, with the frictioning breath coming out on either side of the tongue. The Danish ð is similar to the sound heard in English in people with certain speech impediments, as some post-stroke or cerebral palsy speakers. The blade of the tongue is pressed against the lower teeth, and the frictioning breath comes out over the tongue and under the upper teeth.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @ Professor Wells
    Yes, Danish is an extremely fascinating language for the phonetician and to acquire a native-like pronunciation is quite a challenge.
    As you noticed blødt d (soft d) is indeed somewhat lateralized. I remember reading it somewhere. Unfortunately I don't seem to recall whether it was in Heger's, Brink & Lund's, Basbøll's, Grønnum's or someone else's books, as almost ten years have elapsed since when I studied Danish phonetics (in 2000 I had planned to write an article on it but I never got round to doing it as Danish pronunciation came out to be more than a young scholar could chew; however, a sum of my findings have been brought together in Canepari's Handbook of Phonetics, see the phonosynthesis of Danish in ch. 16).
    If I find the exact reference, I'll post it. Blødt d is precisely a voiced lateralised dental approximant (dental or lamino dental, i.e. with a lowered tip and with lateral contraction, in IPA ð̻̞˞).
    /i/ is indeed significantly centralised but only before blødt d as are the other short (or shortened) front high vowels /i, e; y, ø/ (which –for the sake of the foreigner taking his first steps in the language– it would be better to transcribe as /i, ɪ, y, ʏ/)
    When I discovered the striking effects of r vocalisation (e.g. vare pronounced as [ˈvaˑa], pore as [ˈphɔˑɔ], senere as [ˈs̺ɪnʌʌ] or bære, bærer, bæger, bager all commonly pronounced [ˈpe̞ˑʌ, ˈpɛ̈ˑʌ]) and schwa assimilation (e.g. pige as [ˈphiˑi, ˈphii] or pine as [ˈphiin̩, ˈphiːn̩]), a whole new world opened up for me. I was totally spellbound by it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Anonymous: Hmm, I don't know so many books on the topic, but if you are willing to read in Danish, then Nina Grønnum has written a book called "Rødgrød med fløde. En lille bog om dansk fonetik" which gives a good overview...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Like Mister Wells I was also puzzled to read that the soft d is/can be velarised. Would the Danes be so kind as to send me a sample of it?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Fernando Lamadrid5 November 2010 at 17:55

    At last, someone trusts Canepari. His descriptions are usually accurate as is, not too accurate, but definitely much more than the official IPA.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Fonio: Here's an example of it in the word "æde": http://da.forvo.com/search/%C3%A6de/

    ReplyDelete
  25. Danish is the mother tongue of Otto Jespersen and Eli Fischer Jørgensen. Surely someone's done a strict old-fashioned phoneme analysis?

    ReplyDelete
  26. About the pronunciation of "æde": Wouldn't it be better to say that final /d/ becomes dark /l/, whatever the position of the speech organs may be? Would a Dane be able to hear the difference if this [ð] were impersonated by the "l" in the English word "full"?
    And I entirely agree with Sidney - by the way, wasn't the late Peter Ladefoged also of Danish ascendancy?

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Anonymous: I'm not sure that would be a good idea. I would rather be more confused, I think... And yeah, for me there's quite a difference from the "ball l" to the soft d...

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Anonymous, to a Dane, the /l/ in English 'full' sounds completely different from a Danish /ð/. However, I tried to get my (Scottish) wife to pronounce /l/ and then lower the tip of her tongue, and it suddenly sounded exactly like Danish /ð/, so the position of the tip of the tongue is of great importance.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I've now uploaded a sound file in which I say 'røde, røgede ørreder' /ˈrœːðə ˈrʌjəðə ˈɶrʌðʌ/, phonetically probably somewhat closer to /ˈʕœɫɫ ˈʕʌɫɫɫ ˈɶʌɫʌ/ (twice): http://widmann.org.uk/roederoegedeoerreder.wma

    ReplyDelete
  30. Isn't the "stød" a glottal stop?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Nah, it's rather a part of the prosody, and exists in the sound rather than standing on it's own – i.e. the IPA ad hoc [ˀ] is just a convention. It has been described as a type of creaky voice.

    ReplyDelete
  32. @ Last Anonymous (#5764): According to Wikipedia, it is usually a creaky voice and usually only a glottal stop in "emphatic pronunciation". Maybe Thomas, who seems to be a native speaker with a good knowledge of phonetics, has an answer for that though.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This seems to be quite a diverse group. It seems we have Icelanders, Danes and many others following this blog. That's a bit OT, but it's just neat to me.

    About Danish though. I agree that it's phonetically very challenging. I thought the pronunciation looked almost impossible when I first looked at the language, but now that I know more about it, thanks in part to what I learned here, it doesn't look as bad.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @James, I agree it's normally creaky voice or similar, although a weak glottal stop can also feature.
    Phonologically, it probably best to treat it as a suprasegmental entity, because it might move according to the syllable structure. For instance, brev 'letter' used to be /breːˀv/ (this is how my grandmother, born 1916, used to pronounce it when speaking slowly and carefully). The /v/ then became vocalised (/breːˀw/), and the /e/ got lowered after /r/ (/brɛːˀw/), after which diphthong shortening applied, leading to */brɛˀw/; this is impossible because the stød has to follow either a long vowel or a short vowel + semivowel or voiced consonant, so the stød moves, leading to modern /brɛwˀ/. This is quite regular – e.g., I pronounce mord 'murder' as /moɐ̯ˀ/, not /moːˀɐ̯/.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Sorry ...

    I keep hearing that our 'soft d' /ð/ is lateral, but I can't hear it, myself. Guess that's why I'm not a phonologer.

    Funnily enough, my native dialect is supposed to be one of those dropping the 'soft d' completely, but I've never been able to pick it up, myself. I only use it in exaggeration, and speak more or less Received Pronunciation naturally.

    --o--

    "@ Marc: So would it be OK to pronounce Danish "mad" with a final (alveolar or dental?) [d], like e.g. the final consonant in English "mad"?"

    No. It would more likely end up sounding like /mat/ "mat" (pale, dull, lacklustre).

    "Are the [a] and [ɑ] sounds phonologically contrastive?"
    I'd say so.
    "fare" (danger, run, farrow) /fɑːɐ/
    "fager" (fair, beautiful (archaic)) /faɐ/.

    But my impressions don't match the dictionary as you can see. And I don't seem to able to tell /a/ from /æ/ ...

    --o--

    If anyone is interested the historical work (trying to rival the OED) Dictionary of the Danish Language is online. (Sadly it uses a somewhat non-standard pronunciation transcription.)

    So is the more modern (and more concise) Danish Dictionary.

    --o--

    Just to be pedantic Amager is an island, and only the West bit is considered a (working class) suburb. The East is more gentrified.

    ReplyDelete
  36. "Nah, it's rather a part of the prosody"

    If you have prosody in Danish, you're doing it wrong. There's a reason They say "Danish is basically /&schwa;ːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːːː/.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I'll defer to Widman, but I'd have sworn I had /ø/ in "røde".

    Now I'm starting to worry that my French is far more wrong that I thought ...

    ReplyDelete
  38. @phil: I think Norwegian is the one Scandinavian language in which the written and spoken are closest to each other, making it easier to learn. Mastering Norwegian will help you understand and converse more easily with other Scandinavians; at least my experience is that it's more difficult for Danes and Swedes to understand each other whilst everyone understands the Norwegians. I personally believe Swedish is the most beautiful of the three, in case that's a criterion for you.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Jérôme Poirrier6 November 2010 at 07:43

    @Carlos and Sili
    Beware before comparing Danish r with French r, since the term is extremely ambiguous. Thomas Widman’s comparison with Arabic `ayin is probably less risky.
    Actually, I personally see « French r » as a pure phonological abstraction, whose actual phonetic realizations are extremely variable.

    There is probably some positional variation involved : intervocalic r VS not intervocalic r ; and specific realization in tr/pr/cr clusters.

    And above all, there are variations linked to geography (Eastern border VS the rest of France), to socialects (Titi Parisien VS gentry), and date of birth (singer Edith Piaf’s era VS nowadays).

    Indeed,
    1) my late grandfather, born in 1916, pronounced « r » as singer Edith Piaf did when singing « La vie en rose », i.e. with an « r grasseyé » (akin to Arabic ghayin غ), that is a uvular sound
    both voiced and not smooth ( ?? « creaky » ??).

    2) My 42-year-old cousin from Marly-le-Roi near Paris sounds like a Titi Parisien (cf French Wikipedia on « Titi Parisien ») when he utters « Paris » and « Marly » with a voiced pharyngeal approximant (akin to Arabic ‘ayin ع ).

    3) As for my own accent, it is identified by the rest of France as « de l’Est » ( = from the East of France, understand the Swiss and German borders : Franche-Comté, Alsace, Lorraine), because some of my Rs are voiceless uvular fricatives (a bit like a low energy Arabic Kha خ ), and some others of my Rs are voiceless uvular SMOOTHED fricatives (a bit like a uvularized Russian х ). However, a few of my Rs can be voiced, though, maybe because I do not live in Franche-Comté any more.


    So I think the matter of « French r » is complicated, and has not been extensively described so far ( I’m only improvising on the subject );
    but it is actually good news for foreign learners of French :
    since a huge quantity of sounds do qualify as « r » in the ear of French listeners, so one can feel free to use just any of them. By the way, when Thomas Widmann’s voice utters « røde », the r is not that far from the one my French cousin from Marly uses intervocalically, only I’m not sure my cousin would use it initially too.
    (Ah, and no need to ask me who does use « THE standard R », because really, I have no idea… ;) )

    ReplyDelete
  40. @ Emily: And I've heard others that say Danish sounds the best. People are going to have different opinions on that of course. I have Norwegian heritage. That's why I was looking at Scandinavian languages.

    ReplyDelete
  41. "@Carlos and Sili
    Beware before comparing Danish r with French r"

    I hadn't even thought that far. I was thinking of the value of my French /ø/ and /œ/ compared to my Danish ones.

    And, I guess, /e/ as well.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Sili: What do you mean by if I have a prosody in Danish? I don't think most people think I sound wrong, as I'm a native speaker of it. The stød is considered to be a part of Danish prosody, together with intonation and length.

    ReplyDelete
  43. That looks fine, but then you find that the eː is considerably closer than cardinal 2, the “ɛː” is about cardinal 2, and the “aː” is about cardinal 3.
    Is there any good reason (other than spelling) why they don't transcribe them as /iː ɪː eː ɛː/, then?

    ReplyDelete
  44. [ɪ] is usually seen as a lax vowel, which Danish /eː/ is not. Furthermore, it resembles the Danish spelling better.

    ReplyDelete
  45. "@Sili: What do you mean by if I have a prosody in Danish? I don't think most people think I sound wrong, as I'm a native speaker of it. The stød is considered to be a part of Danish prosody, together with intonation and length."

    The standard complaint about Danish is that it's flat, without intonation. My own English certainly suffers from lack of prosody. I suspect that this is also why Danes accuse Swedish of sound "sing-song".

    ReplyDelete
  46. One reference to Danish “soft d” reminding a foreign ear of a lateral is in H. Basbøll & J. Wagner (1985), Kontrastive Phonologie des Deutschen und Danischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    As the title says, the book is about phonology not phonetics. However, to some extent at least, it also contains phonetic details. The sound is described as an “alveolarer (which I don’t think it is) stimmhafter Sonorant” and phonologically classified under the Halbvokale. The authors remark how “Auditiv kommt der Lateral [l] am nächsten”, see p. 81.

    @ Sil
    It is not a plain lateral (approximant). It’s a LATERALISED approximant, which means that the tongue is laterally contracted (in the same way standard British English r is).

    @ Marc & Thomas Widmann
    Those examples do have a dark resonance. Thank you for pointing that out!
    Is that something restricted to the younger generations and to the Copenhagen area?

    ReplyDelete
  47. @Sili: Danish might be flatter than Swedish, but that doesn't make Danish lack it. My mentioning prosody was only because I said that stød is a part of it.

    @Fonio: As far as I know – and experience– yes, this is a thing belonging to the greater Copenhagen area, although it might be spreading...

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Fonio, I lived in eastern Jutland from I was born till the age of 30, at which point I emigrated to Scotland, so either my /ð/ isn't velarised, or the velarisation is spreading.
    @Sili, I'm sure the first vowel in "røde" used to be /ø/, but it's been lowered by the preceding /r/.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Christian Jensen8 November 2010 at 10:22

    Anyone interested in hearing the Danish "soft d", stød and vowels can hear my take on these at the URL below. I am a native speaker of Danish and a phonetician. I follow the Danish tradition of transcribing the sounds in "Dania" (developed by Otto Jespersen), which unfortunately are neither Unicode nor IPA compliant.

    The site is in Danish, but if you paste the link to my site into Google's translate function, you get a very usable English version of the page (with some mistakes, obviously).

    Link: http://fonetik.dk/dansk_udtale/oevelser/

    ReplyDelete
  50. Re Danish stød and prosody. Words with stød in Danish correspond to words with accent 2 in Swedish and Norwegian, words without stød correspond to accent 1 words, and the contrast dewrives from more ancient Scandinavian dialects. In the modern languages, word accent contrasts are tonal, while the stød is glottal constriction of varying degree, hence the description as creak rather than occlusion.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Ladefoged was indeed of Danish origin, but he was born in Scotland. His accent was (in his own words) "debased RP", and he pronounced his name /ˈladəˌfoʊgəd/ ~ /ˈlædeˌfəʊgəd/.

    ReplyDelete
  52. You all don't know how happy I am to see such obviously accomplished phoneticians describing the difficulty of Danish. I sent this to my (Danish) wife with glee. I'm not sure she believed me when I told her how out of the European mainstream and difficult Danish was.

    On the vowels: I'm not the world's worst language learner. I get around in about nine languages, and I've heard from native Russians, Germans and Arabs that I have "no accent" or other very nice things about my pronunciation of their languages. But the night I met my wife, I tried again and again and again to impress her by getting the simplest thing right: her name, Eva. The first vowel I simply could not do, making it either too /i:/ or too /e:/. I still don't know properly how to describe it, and can only randomly get it right when I'm trying to explain it to an English speaker. However, maybe not surprisingly, when I'm speaking Danish it's more likely to come out right. Five years of learning the language--and one, after all, fairly close to two Germanic languages I already know--and only recently do I feel like I sound better than idiotic.

    I've always described stød to myself as a fleeting glottal stop, never having heard it called creaky. Now that I do, it makes perfect sense.

    To those non-Danophones who asked: Danish is very simple to learn to read, but if you just want to learn a Scandinavian language for fun, and don't want to challenge yourself with one of the hardest-to-pronounce languages you'll come across, try Swedish or Norwegian. Seriously, they are indeed far easier.

    Thanks again, everyone. This has been ridiculously educational, not to mention kind of like a little support group.

    Finally, I can't believe nobody linked this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-mOy8VUEBk

    (Made by Norwegians.)

    ReplyDelete
  53. yeah, I agree..
    I am from Poland and it is very hard for me to know how to pronounce.
    But I think there is no things which You just cant learn, so ... :)

    Big smile from Poland

    ReplyDelete
  54. You led me a merry dance with that YouTube link, RLG. And in view of the fun everyone here's been having with blødt d, I can't believe nobody linked to this bit of merriment either: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGYVgsLKaZI&feature=related

    I did get to understand quite a bit of spoken Danish, and even to be told my accent was "fantastikt" (which must have been either the "talking dog" reaction unsurprisingly common in Danish NSs or facetiously backhanded), but it completely mucked up my Swedish, and the only accent I could attempt thereafter was mangled pan-Scandinavian.

    I have seen and heard stød described as a fleeting glottal stop ever since my first Danish textbook, before the days of tape recorders, but the only imitation of it that would satisfy NSs when I got hold of some was indeed creaky voice, though I hadn’t then come across the term. But I think I may have twitted them with talk of creaking doors even then, and I can't imagine why such a helpful intuitive term has not become more widely known for this prosody.

    ReplyDelete
  55. *Clears throat*

    Danske lyder som en hals sygdom.
    Danish sounds like a throat disease.

    ReplyDelete
  56. David Marjanović5 December 2010 at 01:25

    I'm coming here way too late... but I've watched the infamous "med – no L!" YouTube video, and I've been to Copenhagen, where I met Sili in the flesh. I agree with this:

    Blødt d is precisely a voiced lateralised dental approximant (dental or lamino dental, i.e. with a lowered tip and with lateral contraction, in IPA ð̻̞˞).

    It works when I interpret the blødt d as "[lˠ] and [ð] at the same time" or "[lˠ] with added friction at the tip of the tongue". The difference to plain [lˠ], which is what word-final /l/ sound like, is hard to hear, but now that I know what to pay attention to, I can do it.

    Sili is from Odense [ˈoːn̩sə]*. Enghave, which is between Copenhagen and its airport, is [ˈɪ̝ŋg̊hɛʊ̯]; I was surprised to find out that the g is pronounced. The r in the name Trine is a voiceless fricative which also commonly occurs in Parisian French in this position; it's not [x], and it's not a plain [χ]**; it might be [ħ], except it doesn't seem to distort the following [iː]. Probably [ʀ̞̊] is a good way to put it.

    And when I write "[ə]", I really mean a cardinal [ə].

    * Complete deletion of /d/ before syllabic /n/. My dialect of German usually does that to all lenis plosives in front of syllabic consonants: Regen "rain" – Austrian standard [ˈʀeˑg̊ŋ̩]***, dialect [ˈʀeˑŋ̩]****.
    ** That's the chi symbolizing the voiceless uvular fricative. The Blogspot font fails to distinguish it from x.
    *** Length of the vowel, closedness of the vowel, and shortness of the following consonant coming as an almost indivisible package which is phonemic.
    **** Vowel length not phonemic, but caused by stress.

    =======================

    Over on Language Hat, the Danish sound system was once described as exhibiting two important trends: "all vowels become [ə], and all intervocalic consonants become vocalised".

    =======================

    Sili, I'd be surprised if your French /ø/ and /œ/ were off, but if you're still not sure, skype me. My Skype name is easy to guess. If you can't guess it, find my e-mail address in Google Scholar...

    ReplyDelete
  57. David Marjanović5 December 2010 at 01:27

    Good news: this blog doesn't use the default font of Blogspot. My second footnote is superfluous.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I really appreciate your post and you explain each and every point very well.Thanks for sharing this information.And I’ll love to read your next post too.

    ReplyDelete
  59. There's a lot of discussion about how Danish 'r' lowers surrounding vowels, but can anyone comment on the effects of Danish soft d on the preceding vowel?

    For example, in a song, I once heard the word 'tiden' pronounced [ˈtiːðən] ("TEE-then"). However, as I was reading the word aloud in class, my Danish teacher corrected me to what sounded more like [ˈteð̞ˀn], where the first vowel sounds more like the 'e' in Danish "det", and not like in Danish "de".

    It seems like soft d also affects a preceding 'a' or 'e'. Just want to hear other people's thoughts so I can practice my pronunciation. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  60. Especially in the capital area, the soft d is heavily velarized, and it tends to centralize vowels, and since Danish lacks central vowels it sounds like rounding instead. That means that a word like "side" can sometimes result in something like "syde", and "ned" can sound like "nød".
    I'm not sure I recognize "tiden" sounding like "teden"...

    ReplyDelete
  61. Thanks for the clarification, Marc. From what I hear, it just sounds as if the soft d muffles the preceding vowel, so that's what I've been trying to do when I speak Danish, either that or somehow combine an 'l' with a 'th' sound, haha.

    My teacher, though from western Denmark, says she speaks with a standard Copenhagen accent, and she does sound like what you described above, "heavy velarized".

    I'd have to disagree with the person above who said Danish soft d is how the Spanish soft d is pronounced most of the time. I speak fluent Spanish, and the soft d there sounds more like English 'th' in "then". The tongue certainly is in the same position, though I find the sound is prolonged more in English than in Spanish. If you watch Spanish TV, you can see them sticking out their tongue for soft d in pretty much the same way English-speakers do for 'th'.

    In Danish, it seems that the tip of the tongue is below the lower teeth instead, so a different sound would be produced. And when I watch their mouths, it almost looks as if the tongue is curling upwards to make an 'l' sound.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Yes. I agree with that. The Spanish and Danish soft d are totally different. The only time the tongue sticks out is when children are taught the soft d looking at the teacher sticking his/her tongue all the way out haha :P

    ReplyDelete
  63. Here's another question for you all. To what extent, if any, does vowel breaking or diphthongization of pure vowels occur in colloquial Danish?

    The Wikipedia article on Danish phonology admits of only one instance: "strække" ('stretch') and "strejke" ('strike'), implying that this occurs only when the vowel is followed by 'r' and is before a labial and alveolar.

    Den Danske Ordbog (DDO) online shows those two words as having different pronunciations: [ˈsdʁagə] and [ˈsdʁɑjgə] respectively, though I know dictionaries often prescribe how people 'should' talk, not how they 'do' talk.

    But whenever a Dane pronounces a word like "tale" ('to talk') or "gave" ('gift'), I hear that long vowel realized as [æɪ], so that it sounds almost like an English long 'a', [eɪ]. A song I recently heard rhymes "lagner" ('sheets') with 'aner' ('suspect'). The first word clearly should begin with a diphthong because of the 'g', but the second word should begin with a flat vowel, as DDO gives it [ˈæːnʌ]. To my ears, they both sound as if they contain the sound [æɪ].

    Am I hearing correctly, or am I being too American with my ears? (if that makes any sense, lol)

    ReplyDelete
  64. Obvious you didn't try hungarian language, which is the same, it has some really strange phonetic. Though i know that danish is really special when it comes to phonetic. I admire it.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Marc, do u think, I can use a lateral fricative /ɬ/ or /ɮ/ (like the Welsh ll, not Castillian) for Danish d as in mad?

    ReplyDelete
  66. @Samopriya Basu:
    No. The Danish [ð] as in "mad" isn't characterised by any fricativity at all, you don't hear any noise from it. So a lateral fricative wouldn't be a better option.

    ReplyDelete
  67. A person from Amager is not called "en amager" except maybe by the sorts of people who watch or perform on Paradise Hotel. Say, somebody like Amalie.

    The proper term is "en amagerkaner".

    Yours,
    A person from Amager

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "An amager" as a term for a person from Amager sounds incorrect to me too. However, http://ordnet.dk/ddo/ordbog?select=amager,2&query=amager does list it.

      Delete
  68. Those two sounds don't look like a big deal, the soft D is exactly like I woulds pronounce /ŋ/ but it's placed at the beginning of the syllable instead of the end just like in Shanghainese. The other one is a 'palatal D' just like in Thai but at the end of the syllable instead of the beginning. Nothing that I'm not familiar with.

    But I think that those traditional symbol based phonetic descriptions make those simple mouth movements look much more difficult than they really are.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Hey, very nice site. I came across this on Google, and I am stoked that I did. I will definitely be coming back here more often. Wish I could add to the conversation and bring a bit more to the table, but am just taking in as much info as I can at the moment. Thanks for sharing.
    Scooter For Handicapped Person
    Keep Posting:)

    ReplyDelete
  70. Hey, very nice site. I came across this on Google, and I am stoked that I did. I will definitely be coming back here more often. Wish I could add to the conversation and bring a bit more to the table, but am just taking in as much info as I can at the moment. Thanks for sharing.
    Handicap Tricycle For Sale
    Keep Posting:)

    ReplyDelete
  71. Hey, very nice site. I came across this on Google, and I am stoked that I did. I will definitely be coming back here more often. Wish I could add to the conversation and bring a bit more to the table, but am just taking in as much info as I can at the moment. Thanks for sharing.
    ARAI Approved Side Attachment
    Three Wheeled Scooter For Handicapped

    Keep Posting:)

    ReplyDelete
  72. I would like to say that this blog really convinced me, you give me best information! Thanks, very good post.
    Handicapped

    ReplyDelete
  73. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I have seen the image, looks like lecture about hacking in going on .Please write detailed article on this topic. 192.168 l l

    ReplyDelete
  75. Make sure you may add all records cautiously, or this supplement will in your hand in the few running days, examine the bottled description first before starting this product. Hope so you gets the gest outcomes in quick time.

    Rapid Fast Keto Boost Description
    Rapid Fast Keto Boost weight reduction drugs are made with natural or some critical nutrients can Rapid Fast Keto Boost provide you with a narrow or sharp discern. You will simply get all that which you nee in lifestyles. Just use this once in existence or get lifetime health advantages.
    Read More >>> https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/where-to-buy-rapid-fast-keto-boost

    ReplyDelete

  76. Forskolin Keto Fit Pro
    It works as an urge for meals suppressant and moreover controls hunger feelings. Moreover, it additionally continues the energy level of the frame immoderate.

    Apple Cider Vinegar
    It is an vital element of this product. It is useful in enhancing the digestion and metabolism of fat. It moreover limits the rate of fat formation.
    Read News >> https://sites.google.com/site/ketofitpronew/

    ReplyDelete

  77. Lemon Extract Keto Twenty One
    It works as a cleansing agent; it detoxifies the entire frame (particularly capillaries and veins)

    Raspberry ketones
    They play an vital function in dropping greater fatty layers. These ketones additionally boom the metabolic weight to beautify the burning of fat.
    Read More >>> https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/what-is-keto-twenty-one

    ReplyDelete
  78. your growling tummy. To prevent this, always have some healthy snacks with you such as a fruit or container of cereal or nuts. For the desperate er, you have to scrutinize everything that entyour mouth. Examine your liquid consumption. Do you reach for drinks with high sugar instead of good old zero calorie water? A can of soft drink has an average of calories! Do not be fooled by fruit drinks either. Packaged ones are no better as they have lots of sugar and calories to preserve them. Bubble tea is also the first thing you throw out of the window when on a . Nature Crave Keto The sago pearls that you happily slurp up with your bubble tea.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Debbiesmiracles In retaining with doctor and famous health skilled Joel Fuhrman” Sodium is a virtually vital mineral this is vital for the right overall performance of the body.” ‘Nuf aforesaid.
    Beta-hydroxybutyrate or BHB is AN exogenous ketone that performs a helping role into the endogenous ketones being made clearly by your frame when you enter ketonemia. BHB is that the again part of Debbiesmiracles.


    READ MORE >>>> https://debbiesmiracles.com/
    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Is-debbiesmiracles-guide-about-health-tips
    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/592223419736594950/

    ReplyDelete
  80. Sharktankpedia
    How Does Sharktankpedia Work?
    You is probably thinking how Sharktankpedia features because ketosis is a natural mechanics. Well, this components turns on your body to enter ketosis with out you having to take any ketogenic meals or a particular food regimen. How does this occur?


    READ MORE >>>>> https://sharktankpedia.org/

    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/592223419736595384

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Is-Sharktankpedia-Pills-Platform-Trusty

    ReplyDelete
  81. Governmenthorizons Side Effects of Governmenthorizons
    It is 100% natural and herbal product and not using a aspect consequences. The effectiveness of Governmenthorizons has been accepted through many certified labs. You need to use this product with none doubt.


    READ MORE >>>> https://www.governmenthorizons.org/

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Are-there-any-side-effects-og-governmenthorizons-blog

    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/587719820108868139

    ReplyDelete
  82. Autobodycu How lengthy to watch for the result?
    There isn't any magic at the back of Autobodycu pills due to the fact they may be botanical assets that permit proper visibility on health without facet consequences. You must be patient here and wait at least three to four weeks with a reduction in crucial calories. During the first weeks, there might be a discount in the weight of body water and later a natural fats burning technique become observed. So go along with self belief with these herbal pills and get a rather slender shape.


    READ MORE >>>>> https://www.autobodycu.org/

    https://www.pinterest.com/pin/618963542524583629

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Can-Autobodycu-Help-About-Fitness-Tips

    ReplyDelete

  83. Amazin Brain Hilarious clips of your favorite celebrities singing in Amazin Brain clips from The Late Late Show with James Corden. Amazin Brain equipment maker Singing Machine designed a microphone that makes you're feeling like you're internet hosting your personal episode of the popular James Corden show. The May 20, 2015 episode, which followed the finale of Late Present with David Letterman, was the very best rated episode of The Late Late Present within the history of the franchise with an audience of four million viewers and a score of two.5., despite starting 20 minutes late because of Letterman's present running over its scheduled finish time. Conan in Cuba: Conan 'Brien becomes the primary American late-evening host to do a show in The Fitness Supplement in additional than 50 years. With James Corden, Paul McCartney. Roomy, stylish, and featuring the Amazin Brain emblem entrance and middle, this Amazin Brain Neon Brand Canvas Tote Bag will quickly change into your go-to accent. Corden's Amazin Brain by the streets of London with pop singer Adele, a sketch which featured on his speak present in January 2016, Amazin Brain was the biggest YouTube viral video of 2016.
    https://www.thefitnesssupplement.com/
    https://www.thefitnesssupplement.com/amazin-brain/

    ReplyDelete
  84. Surgenx Keto
    over the top expensive. At the top end, in the event that you follow Prüvit's rules on "getting in the n8tive zone" (which is such a gimmicky advertising motto it nearly causes me to wince), you will require 2 servings of their Keto-OS item every day. This implies around 60 servings for every month, which will slow down you an astounding $390 every month on the off chance that you purchase direct from their site
    http://ketoismiracle.com/surgenx-keto

    ReplyDelete
  85. ketovatru review
    It in like way recommends you most likely won’t have any desire to bounce the firearm and buy such another, untested condition. Taking everything into account, what’s our sentiment about this recipe? Without a doubt, the Official Instant Keto Website doesn’t for the most part give us that much data. In any case, underneath, we will discuss fixings, reactions, and that is just the beginning.
    http://ketoismiracle.com/ketovatru-review

    ReplyDelete
  86. Thank you so much for this excellent blog article. Your writing style and the way you have
    presented your content is awesome. Now I am pretty clear on this topic. aroma rice cooker instructions

    ReplyDelete
  87. Tibi’s PRAYER, got me emotional 😭 Watching from Botswana 🇧🇼Stokkies must learn to shut it, his face-PRICELESS!! Xolile and Romeo have literallyScandal Full Episodes had the longest honeymoon 🙄 they should be back Xolile and romeo's child is very lucky to be born into 2 rich families😇😇Xolile is hella annoying🙄 everything is about her,her,her,her,sheeeeshRomeo can never do wrong in his mother's eyes😂 I wish I had a mom like Grace😏 I could get away with a lot guys did yall see how Jewel stood up next to Didi like yeah im with mumzy on this one. Mama ka Jewel tShadow put on your wig girl let's see you seduce your way out of this one his line killed me, Didihai Am in love with Dintle and Romeo's scenes. I always put them on replay 😂😂😍😘 Mama ka Jewel 😍😍😍😍...that’ was cute Grace is so sweet and very

    ReplyDelete
  88. Bioviderma Serum The developing older of the pores and pores and skin is specially due to numerous phenomena which encompass an terrible manner of lifestyles, insufficient vitamins, common and excessive exposure to the solar, using chemical substances…

    SHOP NOW >>>>> https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/bioviderma-serum-does-it-really-work-read-review-before-buy

    https://sites.google.com/site/biovidermaserum/

    ReplyDelete
  89. Ultra Pure 360 Keto Ultra Pure 360 Keto– Nowadays, there rectangular degree those new diets being unfastened. It is puzzling for an individual to settle on a specific weight-reduction plan for weight loss. For example, the Paleo weight loss program is one that includes consumption ingredients that folks from the c language. The idea in the back of this weight loss plan is that oldsters World Health Organization won’t eat that food unnoticed to locate fat or dangerous, so weight loss program need to include contemporary time also. Ultra Pure 360 Keto

    READ MORE >>>>> https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/ultra-pure-360-keto-reviews-price-side-effects-buy

    http://ultrapure360keto.mystrikingly.com/

    ReplyDelete
  90. Advanced Keto Plus Money-Back Guarantee
    The main feature of any weight loss supplement is its money-back guarantee offer. The formula is based on experience and the struggle for months behind its formation. The company offers 18 days of the money-back guarantee. If you are not satisfied with the product, you can return and have your money back.


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/advancedketoplusweb/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/advanced-keto-plus-review-level-up-with-fat-burning

    ReplyDelete
  91. Novum Health Keto This makes your body lose weight very quickly and also keeps your carbs safe and intact. It rapidly galvanizes all your unwanted body fats gradually. It has obtained its certification and approval only after undergoing many clinical trials and medical tests successfully. Hence you can use it with complete trust and faith.

    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/novumhealthketo/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/novum-health-keto-most-used-diet-supplement-of-the-year

    ReplyDelete
  92. Primal Grow Pro Key List Of Ingredients
    Primal Grow Pro is enriched with best herbal and herbal extracts that do not have any any side effects. It is one of the most essential and critical male enhancement that may make you more powerful and appealing on mattress. Read extracts information as follows:-


    READ MORE >>> http://primalgrowpropill.mystrikingly.com/

    https://sites.google.com/site/primalgrowpropill/

    ReplyDelete
  93. Slim Naturals Instructions to us eSlim Naturals?
    You are surely supposed to use and have only 2 two tablets of Balanced Health Keto a day as per the great doctors. Take one of the tablets and do so after you have had your morning breakfast and the other pill is needed to get taken just after dinner. Carefully try to conform to all the prescribed dosages every time you make sure to use it.


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/slimnaturalsweb/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/slim-naturals-completely-safe-weight-loss-formula

    ReplyDelete
  94. Magnolia Keto Purchasing Method of Magnolia Keto
    Many people do not know the exact place to get this supplement, or they wander in the local store. This supplement is at the online stores from where you will be potent to get.

    Go at the official site of Magnolia Keto or get all details, read the reviews or make sure this site is official in real. Confirm your order by filling the form.


    READ MORE >>> http://magnoliaketo.mystrikingly.com/

    https://sites.google.com/site/magnoliaketonew/

    ReplyDelete
  95. Trim Fast Keto What happens straightaway? Well within the wake of undertaking the ketosis system, your body gets bunches of benefits like, your body consumes off the fat for energy rather carbs which are the appropriate wellspring of vitality earlier than ketosis. Additionally, maintain your body energy level up, and the Trim Fast Keto serotonin impacts assist to get a brand new and dynamic thoughts and provide you with a decrease appetite degree.

    Visit Official Website >>> https://www.facebook.com/Trim-Fast-Keto-100740301581169/

    https://sites.google.com/site/trimfastketoofficialweb/

    https://utah.instructure.com/eportfolios/36127/Home/Trim_Fast_Keto_Pills_Reviews

    ReplyDelete
  96. Biolife Keto Effets secondaires de Biolife Keto?
    Biolife Keto ne vous donne aucun effet secondaire. Ce supplément est exempt de toutes sortes de produits chimiques et contient uniquement des ingrédients naturels qui le rendent bénéfique pour vous. Vous pouvez ressentir de la constipation, des vomissements et des maux de tête lorsque vous commencez à prendre ces pilules, mais ces symptômes cétoniques ne sont pas permanents et disparaîtront après quelques jours.


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/biolifeketonew/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/biolife-keto-vous-voulez-couper-votre-graisse-corporelle

    ReplyDelete
  97. Realtone Keto Realtone Keto Testimonial?
    Customer Testimonials are a good approach to determine if or not a supplement can help you or not. Clients like the way that they feel after using Realtone Keto. Many of them said they found the supplement very beneficial in relation to weight reduction. Many clients also appreciated that this supplement practically has no additives. This is an indication that the nutritional supplement is safe for your system.


    READ MORE >>> http://realtoneketonew.mystrikingly.com/

    https://sites.google.com/site/realtoneketonew/

    ReplyDelete
  98. Biolife Keto Effets secondaires
    Vous serez étonné de constater avec précision que ce produit n'a aucun type d'effet de battement vers le bas et de réseau destructeur ni aucune réaction indésirable à votre corps et à votre santé. Comme il est normalement créé avec des sources naturelles, comme indiqué plus haut dans cette revue à propos de Biolife Keto. Où acheter Biolife Keto?


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/biolifeketofr/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/biolife-keto-une-mthode-plus-simple-pour-perdre-du-poids

    ReplyDelete
  99. Keto Lyte Benefits of Keto Lyte
    This formula is very beneficial for healthy weight loss. This product hold record of being the best-selling product for weight loss. The use of product gives guaranteed results.
    It promotes ketosis because of the natural ingredients in the formula. Ketosis is the stage that directly promotes healthy weight loss.


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/ketolyte2020/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/keto-lyte-the-best-way-to-undergo-rapid-weight-loss

    ReplyDelete
  100. VidaGenex Keto Burn Side Effects of VidaGenex Keto Burn?
    VidaGenex Keto Burn has been develop by using natural ingredients, and people need not to worry if there is any side effect. VidaGenex Keto Burn converts fat into essential energy. It helps to reduce the appetite and offer the best Ketogenic diet.


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/vidagenexketoburnweb/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/vidagenex-keto-burn-update-2020-11-things-you-need-to-know

    ReplyDelete
  101. Biogenix RX What Is The Actual Dosage Of Biogenix RX?
    You Have to maintain in mind the proper Quantity of dose on every occasion you’re likely to utilize Biogenix RX. As said thru the manufacturer, most of the men are had to take capsules of the goods every day. One element that’s distinctly important to recollect is this testosterone boosting dietary dietary supplements handiest for men and women shouldn’t use it.


    READ MORE >>> http://biogenixrxnew.mystrikingly.com/

    https://tryf82.wixsite.com/biogenixrx

    ReplyDelete
  102. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  103. It enhances sex power and staying strength common contemporary not unusual Vitrexotin normal not unusual conventional basic overall performance too.
    It protects you from embarrassment and ache.
    It gives unique types of consequences from individual to man or woman.
    It’s unavailable to any retail keep or well-known keep.
    You can exquisite purchase this complement thru its web page.
    It’s possible to use this complement after reading its commands
    Side Effects Of Vitrexotin:
    It is maximum of the amazing body improving Supplements as a manner to help to govern your hormones. Using this supplement, it's miles possible to manipulate your hormones degree too without problems. No such problem outcomes are the usage of this product Vitrexotin because of the truth all of the substances used in this product are herbal.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Ultra Trim Keto Maintains the body muscles mass or also strengthen to the bones. A person when turns older will never feel any pain in the muscles or bones due to this product.

    Ultra Trim Keto help in metabolism working. Average person metabolism is far slower than that person who starts using this weight loss pills.


    READ MORE >>> https://sites.google.com/site/ultratrimketo2020/

    https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/ultra-trim-keto-1-ketogenic-weight-loss-pills

    ReplyDelete
  105. Pure Sol Keto What are the ingredients in Pure Sol Keto?
    Turmeric – the most used and the best highly efficient of all the element here is turmeric.
    Forskolin – the most genuine of all and also one of the most widely used one is forskolin.
    Guarana – this is added into this to cause a very much great level of development in the brain.


    READ MORE >>> http://puresolketo-2020.mystrikingly.com/

    https://sites.google.com/site/puresolketo2020/

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.