Discussing the weak form of saint (blog, 9 June) reminds me of another word that has a weak form in BrE but not in AmE: sir. As a vocative, it’s sɜː(r) everywhere. But when it precedes a name, in BrE it normally has the weak form sə(r).So we say sə Humphrey, sə Galahad, Professor sə Howard Fergus.
With a possible linking r, we have sə(r) Alexander Fleming and sə(r) Alan Sugar (star of The Apprentice, recently ennobled and given a cabinet post).
The only circumstance where sir would be strong in this position is if accented for emphasis or contrast. There was a case just today when the Scottish Olympic cycling champion Chris Hoy received a knighthood. Here’s the TV interviewer asking him “How does ˈsɜː Chris sound?”
Note to non-Brits: he’s Sir Chris Hoy or Sir Chris, but never Sir Hoy.
Posts
Quite so. However (since you use it in the title), there are actually three forms of "Yes sir" in AmE: as two separate words with a noticeable pause, with /s:/ in the middle, and with /s/ in the middle. The two latter forms, or maybe just the third form, are often written Yessir. I don't belong to any of the subcultures that use this construction (except ironically, in which case the first form is used), so I can't explain the semantic distinctions.
ReplyDelete